
A prime example of this is the myth that marriage could be quietly annulled if it wasn’t consummated. I don’t know who started that, but it is unarguably false. There was an ancient Scottish tradition that allowed for annulment in certain circumstances if the marriage was not consummated, but for all intents and purposes, marriage was permanent especially in England. Furthermore, in England, annulment was messy and scandalous and never, ever happened quietly. It also socially ruined both the husband and the wife. Even divorce was difficult to obtain until King Henry VII legalized divorce in England, and even then, never became an easy thing to do until late in the 20th century.
Today, more and more publishers are looking for historical accuracy, but still not enough to satisfy many history geeks. The winner of a nationally recognized historical contest began her Regency novel with a grand wedding full of descriptions that are modern inventions which never happened in that era. Why did she win? Probably because it was a lovely fantasy that blended history with modern-day traditions, and she was a good writer. Too bad the judges overlooked the fact that it was historically inaccurate. A few hours spent in research would have won her not only the contest, but the respect of other regency authors and the well-informed readers who know better. However, she probably understood that readers have a certain expectation and wanted to meet that instead of rely upon historical accuracy.
Why do we care about historical accuracy? Several reasons.
First, it’s true. The fiction comes from the plot and the characters, not the setting.
Second, it helps preserve our heritage.
Third, we can learn from the past and see that maybe the good old days weren’t all that good, which helps us appreciate our day....or that the good old days really were wonderful and should be treasured--and remembered.
Fourth, many readers (and writers) are fascinated with that era and want sources to guide them through it.
Fifth, keeping an accurate backdrop helps shape the characters. Research is more than just learning about what the clothing looked like, or what kind of carriages they drove; it’s about society and people, how they behaved and what their expectations and frustrations were. It’s a realm long gone and our only doorway back is through painstaking research.
In the midst of the on-line ranting, one of the published authors

As a writer, my job is threefold:
1) do my homework well enough to please my fellow history geeks,
2) make the story compelling enough to hook readers who don't care whether or not it's accurate, and
3) don’t stress over writers/readers who prefer the fairytale.
It resonated within me. I hope it helps you, too.
5 comments:
Hi Donna,
Great reasons to do your research! Knowing one has written the best book one can is a certainly a writer's goal - and if it is inaccurrate, then it isn't one's best.
I expect anything labeled 'historical' to be historically accurate in relation to the time and place and historical figures and events. I enjoy learning historical facts and trivia while reading historical books. If I can't trust the author to do her research, I won't buy the book.
I wholeheartedly agree. Research takes time to get it right. Even if it means posting annoying questions on writing loops. The result is worth the effort.
I was talking with an author the other day and she was telling me about how much time she spent doing research. I was amazed at all the time she gave to her story before she'd started, but appreciated her books more because of it. Thanks for your take on it.
I couldn't agree with you more. Too many people can't remember where they "learned" a history fact, and all too often it is out of fiction. At least help them get their facts right!
Post a Comment