by Pamela Cowan
According to
Greg Buzwell's 2020 article for the British Library Newsletter, he states that “During the
late 18th and early 19th century, writing, and especially the writing of
fiction for money, was seen as a most unladylike activity. Unseemly parallels
with prostitution arose regarding the notion of women writing novels which were
then sold to anyone willing to pay. Derogatory terms such as 'female
quill-driver’ were common.”
The idea that women’s writing was equated to prostitution is profoundly disturbing but not a real shock. Women have always been asked to act a certain way. Like children, it was best if they were seen and not heard—or read. Even Pericles, the great statesman of Athens stated, "The chief glory of a woman is not to be talked of and that publicity in women is detestable." While he himself loved to be talked about and listened to.
Despite
all this, women did read and write books. By the mid 1700’s the tag "By a
Lady" became a common thing to see on a title page. This meant not only a woman
had written the book but that the woman was of a certain class and, therefore, readable by respectable women.
Jane
Austen published her first novel, Sense and Sensibility, under the tag "By a
Lady." Her second book, Pride and Prejudice, was tagged "By the author of Sense and Sensibility." How sad is it that one of our most loved and acclaimed
authors never saw her name on the title page of one of her books?
Things
did not change quickly. In May of 1846, Charlotte, Emily and Anne Bronte
published a collection of poems under the names Currer, Ellis, and Acton Bell.
In
1919, Virginia Woolf wrote an essay that helped restore Eliot to her rightful
position after a period of Victorian and Edwardian backlash. For Woolf, the
establishment of a female literary tradition was vitally important. Woolf
argued that, “Each generation of women writers builds upon the successes of
those who have gone before, and for that to be possible the lives of those
women need to be known and their books read, studied, valued and enjoyed.”
Contemporary women writers are indebted to the women writers of the past. The ones who excelled at their craft could not be ignored or left out of the
canon. Today we would like to see a world where writers are not judged by
gender. However, the use of pseudonyms continues, as does the use of initials
to disguise the gender of an author.
I originally wrote my books as P.J. Cowan. For this I once received a one-star rating and the following review: “The author thinks she’s being sneaky using initials, but I knew she was a woman right from the start. I am giving her one star for trying to get away with it.”
I hadn’t known being a woman was a bad thing, or something I had to hide. It was the twenty-first century after all. The review stunned me. I had not set out to deceive. There was a photo of me on the cover! My reason for using initials was to avoid setting up preconceptions of gender in my readers' minds as I sometimes have male main characters. Still, the review left me feeling somehow guilty even if the initials were never meant to hide who I was. (I did later change my name, but only because there is a successful children’s book author with the same name who was writing long before me. We kept getting each other’s email!)
Others have and do use
initials to disguise their gender. In the 1970’s I became a huge fan of science
fiction. How delighted I was to discover that two of my favorite authors, James
Tiptree, Jr. and Andre Norton, were actually Alice Bradley Sheldon and Alice
Mary Norton.
Even more recently, in 1997, when Bloomsbury Children’s Books published Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone the book appeared as by "J K Rowling"—it being feared that publishing as "Joanne Rowling" would alienate young male readers.
Though the need to hide our gender is obviously still an issue, the freedom of print-on-demand publishing and independent authorship will—I’m certain—force change. The connection between writer and reader will be more direct and less controlled by potentially prejudiced and biased gate keepers.
I, for one, am proud to be called a female quill driver!
4 comments:
What an interesting blog post! Thanks for the history on quill-drivers.
I think it was Thomas Jefferson, but I could be wrong, who called women writers "Scribbling women ". Rather derogatory.
Thanks for the blog post.
Diana
Thanks Diana. My husband bought me a quill pen once, to decorate my desk. It means more to me know that I know that expression!
Interesting post, Pam. We stand on the shoulders of past female writers.
We certainly do. Some of them would probably be ashamed of me for the typo in a previous comment. This writing thing is tough!
Post a Comment